RFC Seraing - Jong KRC Genk 14.03.2026
-
14/03/26
15:00
|
Round 30
-
- 2 : 2
- Finished
1st Half
0:2
2nd Half
2:0
57
RFC Seraing
68
RFC Seraing
76
RFC Seraing
78
RFC Seraing
87
RFC Seraing
87
RFC Seraing
90 + 1
RFC Seraing
1.55
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.5
46
%
Ball possession
54
%
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
- 1.7
- Goals scored per match
- 1.2
- 1.1
- Goals conceded per match
- 1.8
- 32.1'
- Minutes/Goal scored
- 30'
Chat
Be the first to leave a comment
Match facts
During the last 5 meetings, RFC Seraing have won 0 times, there have been 3 draws while Jong KRC Genk have won 2 times. The goal difference is 8-4 in favour of Jong KRC Genk.
Last season's matches: 0-2 (RFC Seraing at home) and 2-2 (Jong KRC Genk at home).
Jong KRC Genk have a losing streak of 3 matches in Challenger Pro League.
Did you know that RFC Seraing scores 29% of their goals between the minutes 76-90?
Predictions
As part of the Challenger Pro League (Belgium) tournament, the match between teams RFC Seraing and Jong KRC Genk is scheduled. The game will start on 14.03 at 15:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth RFC Seraing Jong KRC Genk betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
5 / 10 of last matches RFC Seraing in all competitions, at least one team did not score
5 / 10 of last matches RFC Seraing in Challenger Pro League, at least one team has not scored
2 / 5 of the last matches between the teams, at least one of the teams did not score
6 / 10 of last matches Jong KRC Genk in all competitions, at least one team did not score
6 / 10 of last matches Jong KRC Genk in Challenger Pro League, at least one team has not scored
7 / 10 of last matches in all competitions RFC Seraing did not lose
| # | Team | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 32 | 10 | 8 | 14 | 35:42 | -7 | 38 | |
| 11 | 32 | 8 | 11 | 13 | 37:44 | -7 | 35 | |
| 12 | 32 | 9 | 8 | 15 | 33:47 | -14 | 34 | |
| 14 | 32 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 46:55 | -9 | 31 | |
| 15 | 32 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 42:59 | -17 | 31 | |
| 16 | 32 | 5 | 6 | 21 | 33:55 | -22 | 21 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yokoyama A.
Midfielder
|
7.3 | 90 | 1 | 0.07 | 1 | 0.4 | 3 | 21/26(81%) | - | - |
Kiaba Brughmans L.
Goalkeeper
|
6.9 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 38/47(81%) | - | - |
Palacios A.
Defender
|
6.3 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 79/85(93%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yokoyama A.
Midfielder
|
3 | 1 | 0.12 | 2 | - | - | - | 3 |
|
Kiaba Brughmans L.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Palacios A.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Palacios A.
Defender
|
1 | 79/85(93%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 1/2(50%) | 95 | 3/7(43%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Yokoyama A.
Midfielder
|
1 | 21/26(81%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.4 | 7/9(78%) | 47 | - | 2/7(29%) | 1/7(14%) | - | - |
|
Kiaba Brughmans L.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 38/47(81%) | - | - | - | - | - | 56 | 6/15(40%) | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Palacios A.
Defender
|
8 | 2/3(67%) | 2/5(40%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Yokoyama A.
Midfielder
|
7 | - | 1/7(14%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kiaba Brughmans L.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kiaba Brughmans L.
Goalkeeper
|
0.08 | 3 | 2.08 | 2 | 1 | 4 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
