Huntsville City FC - Chicago Fire FC II 11.04.2026
Next match Huntsville City FC - Chicago Fire FC II on 05/07/2026
- 11/04/26 20:00
-
- 0 : 0
- FT/Pen
- Pen score - 2:4
1st Half
0:0
2nd Half
0:0
0.17
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.03
48
%
Ball possession
52
%
0
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
3
- 2
- Goals scored per match
- 1.9
- 1.9
- Goals conceded per match
- 2.7
- 23.8'
- Minutes/Goal scored
- 22.2'
Chat
Be the first to leave a comment
Predictions
As part of the MLS Next Pro (USA) tournament, the match between teams Huntsville City FC and Chicago Fire FC II is scheduled. The game will start on 11.04 at 20:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Huntsville City FC Chicago Fire FC II betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
9 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Huntsville City FC did not draw
9 / 10 of last matches in MLS Next Pro Huntsville City FC did not draw
3 / 5 of the last matches between the teams ended in a win
6 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Chicago Fire FC II did not draw
6 / 10 of last matches in MLS Next Pro Chicago Fire FC II did not draw
7 / 10 of last matches Huntsville City FC in all competitions had less than 3 goals
| # | Form MLS Next Pro 2026 | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 20:18 | 2 | 19 | |
| 16 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 25:28 | -3 | 19 | |
| 17 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15:13 | 2 | 18 | |
| 20 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20:20 | 0 | 18 | |
| 21 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 15:15 | 0 | 16 | |
| 22 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 15:19 | -4 | 15 |
| # | Group Eastern | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 20:18 | 2 | 19 | |
| 9 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 25:28 | -3 | 19 | |
| 10 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15:13 | 2 | 18 | |
| 11 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 15:15 | 0 | 16 | |
| 12 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 15:19 | -4 | 15 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pariano N.
Midfielder
|
7.5 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.04 | 1 | 51/56(91%) | - | - |
|
Cupps C.
Defender
|
7 | 90 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 98/107(92%) | - | - |
|
Borso D.
Midfielder
|
6.6 | 90 | - | 0.1 | - | 0.47 | 1 | 37/47(79%) | - | - |
|
Sullivan N.
Forward
|
6.3 | 62 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 13/16(81%) | - | - |
|
Hlyut V.
Forward
|
6.1 | 52 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 13/16(81%) | - | - |
|
Gaines J.
Defender
|
5.9 | 28 | - | - | - | - | - | 8/10(80%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Borso D.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.13 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Cupps C.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Pariano N.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Sullivan N.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Gaines J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hlyut V.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Borso D.
Midfielder
|
2 | 37/47(79%) | 1 | - | - | 0.47 | 8/12(67%) | 78 | 2/3(67%) | 2/4(50%) | 1/4(25%) | - | - |
|
Cupps C.
Defender
|
2 | 98/107(92%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 7/12(58%) | 114 | 6/10(60%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Sullivan N.
Forward
|
2 | 13/16(81%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 4/6(67%) | 29 | - | - | 2/4(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Hlyut V.
Forward
|
1 | 13/16(81%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/6(50%) | 28 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - |
|
Gaines J.
Defender
|
- | 8/10(80%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 16 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pariano N.
Midfielder
|
- | 51/56(91%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 14/18(78%) | 72 | 5/7(71%) | - | 1/3(33%) | 3 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pariano N.
Midfielder
|
12 | 1/2(50%) | 5/10(50%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Borso D.
Midfielder
|
9 | - | 2/9(22%) | 2 | - | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Hlyut V.
Forward
|
7 | 1/1(100%) | 1/6(17%) | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Sullivan N.
Forward
|
7 | - | 5/6(83%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Cupps C.
Defender
|
3 | 1/1(100%) | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - | 2 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Gaines J.
Defender
|
3 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
